What is waiting for godot about

But Sam didn't talk about death, he didn't give lectures about what his play meant. Director Anthony Page, currently rehearsing the new Broadway Godot, worked with Beckett when he directed Britain's first uncensored version of the play in He just wrote it, hearing these voices.

He simply wanted to communicate the tone of the voice, what was happening between the characters. He said that the laughter and the tears were all that mattered. Neither of the new productions will attempt to spin a directorial interpretation around the crashes of the City or Wall Street. For the text is the perfect statement of futility and redemption, of lying in the gutter but looking at the stars, and audiences who seek the pattern of their own fears will find it for themselves.

A hundred years from now, the recession, it must be hoped, will be in the history books, but Vladimir and Estragon will still be on a stage somewhere - still waiting for Godot. Details at waitingforgodottheplay. Her decision to stage Waiting for Godot helped make history: the production brought so much media attention to Sarajevo. Ultimately it was the journalists who saved Sarajevo and the production of Waiting for Godot played a role in that.

At one point the Washington Post referred to the play as "Waiting for Clinton" and we were very happy with this connection. At that time, people really thought it was just a matter of time before somebody would rescue the city. It was outrageous that, at the end of the 20th century, on live TV, the world could see daily bombardments of the city, and do nothing.

Every single day we thought that our Godot would come and every night we understood that he wouldn't. I liked this staging because it suggested that the couple's plight was universal. People risked their lives coming five to 10km on foot to the theatre because there was no public transport.

We performed by candlelight because there was no electricity. Trying to find candles was a major problem, as was the malnourishment of all of our actors. Susan stole rolls for them from her hotel breakfast. Yes, it was a struggle to put on the show, but it brought our message to the world. Chris had seen a photograph of two guys floating on a door during the floods which immediately reminded him of Gogo and Didi [Estragon and Vladimir] and inspired him to direct Waiting for Godot.

Later, in collaboration with the artist Paul Chan and Creative Time, we mounted the production outdoors in New Orleans's ninth ward, surrounded by square miles of homes that had been destroyed. The show was not only commemorative but also cathartic; it allowed us to grieve and to rebuild. But we knew that Godot also symbolised our very existence which had disappeared; our neighbourhood was no longer there, and we feared it would not return.

After Katrina, many survivors were asking 'Should I give up? A classic such as Waiting for Godot speaks across generations directly to each audience member. I chose only to use women in my production for Avignon because I was convinced that female actresses introduce a range of acting possibilities that is broader than for men.

When putting on Waiting for Godot, you are very limited in your possibilities, because Beckett specified how it should be played. So using just female actresses was an enormous step. Among our own changing circumstances, it abides. I first encountered the play when I was a theatre major in college, lo, those many years ago, and read it grudgingly, having been told by my professors that it consisted of a maddening slog through the existential questions of life. After reading it, I felt, if anything, that they had been too kind.

But I saw that some of my classmates were drawn to it, like a mountaineer to Everest. Godot challenges, and actors adore being challenged. They also adore being the center of attention. You might know this joke we used to tell in college: an actor reads the script for his next play for the first time. That torqueing, circular dialogue? A challenge. Keeping the audience interested, even laughing, when there are only two of you onstage for many long minutes?

Finding new life in a play that most people who sit in the audience will have some preconceived notion about? A big, meaty challenge. Image: via Wikimedia Commons. Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive notifications of new posts by email. Email Address. Interesting Literature is a participant in the Amazon EU Associates Programme, an affiliate advertising programme designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by linking to Amazon.

Share this: Tweet. Like this: Like Loading One Comment haoyando June 1, at pm. Subscribe via Email Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive notifications of new posts by email. Interesting Literature. Privacy Policy.

Most human beings adopt a passive stance and see themselves as powerless in the face of death. This is true to a certain extent—one cannot conquer death when it comes. Yet, there is still some amount of control one can exert over when he or she will die. This control lies in the ability of human beings to commit suicide.

Vladimir and Estragon occasionally express this desire to take their own lives. In Act One, they debate hanging themselves from a tree but are afraid that the first will break the branch, thus leaving the other alive and on his own Beckett 1. At first, the scene appears to be only tragic. The basic human instinct is survival, so when one not only lacks this instinct, but also seeks a means to directly counteract it—it invokes feelings of despair and regret from those witnessing it.

However, when they make their decision to refrain it becomes morbidly humorous:. What do we do? When a person dies, he or she no longer exists in the world. Therefore, worldly concerns, like safety, become irrelevant. Looking beneath the surface, however, we can see that his response is not pure nonsense. Vladimir and Estragon feel that they must continue living because death and the separation that it risks are too dangerous, or rather, obscure.

However there is more. They realize that while committing suicide may grant them temporary control over life, the state of being dead will throw them into a condition of helplessness once more. Therefore, Vladimir and Estragon feel as if they lack control in life and in death. The way in which this sentiment is conveyed is tragicomic due to its ability to speak to the audience on two different levels.

Whereas death can be controlled to a certain extent, time is something which no one can exert any control over. Our attempts to organize time and to control its speed are mere illusions—time has no schedule, and it continues on despite our regulations. This does not mean, however, that our own perception of time cannot be altered. If one is busy, time appears to go by quickly; if one is idle, it goes by slowly. In Waiting for Godot, the tragic element in regards to time is that Vladimir and Estragon are idle.

They spend the entire play waiting around for another man. Anyone who has spent a long amount of time waiting on another person knows how torturous it can be.